Appendix B

 

ZIS Documentation (Excerpt)

Schauffel, N., Schmidt, I., Peiffer, H., & Ellwart, T. (2021). ICT Self-Concept Scale (ICT-SC25). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). https://doi.org/10.6102/zis308_exz

Terms of use This work is an excerpt of the article ‘Schauffel, N., Schmidt, I., Peiffer, H., & Ellwart, T. (2021). Self-concept related to information and communica-tion technology: Scale development and validation. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 1100149., Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100149 licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Nomological network of ICT-SC25g/e

Construct

Sample(s)

SCGL

SCCO

SCPS

SCGE

SCCSA

SCSP

Affective

Technophobia

S3

-.60***

-.57***

-.52***

-.53***

-.49***

-.44***

Technostrain

S4

-.22**

-.24**

-.24**

-.24**

-.32***

-.25**

ICT interest

S4

.63***

.56***

.58***

.66***

.57***

.70***

Behavioral

 Frequency of use of a

Emails

S3

.39***

.33***

.32***

.30***

.33***

.28***

Internet

S3

.40***

.38***

.34***

.35***

.34***

.31***

Payment services

S3

.37***

.37***

.38***

.38***

.35***

.32***

Spreadsheet programs

S3

.37***

.37***

.33***

.39***

.34***

.30***

Online conferences/chats

S3

.19*

.26**

.24**

.24**

.12

.11

Text processing programs

S3

.32***

.40***

.37***

.45***

.44***

.38***

Programming and coding

S3

.00

.03

.06

.07

.08

.24**

Cognitive

ICT trust

S4

.41***

.37***

.36***

.41***

.46***

.45***

Performance expectancy

S4

.28**

.27**

.31**

.29**

.35***

.35***

Effort expectancy

S4

.45***

.51***

.48***

.46***

.51***

.44***

Person

Age

S2/3/5

-.26***/-.13*/-.26***

-.22***/-.19***/-.25***

-.22***/-.17**/-.19***

-.27***/-.22***/-.21***

-.13**/-.16**/-.17***

-.19***/-.20***/-.27***

Education

S2/3/5

.14***/.22***/.08+

.17***/.27***/.08+

.16***/.23***/.10*

.22***/.26***/.09*

.10*/.19***/.05

.15***/.16**/.03

Gender

S2/3/5

-.08+/-.02/-.10*

-.10*/.00/-.10*

-.15***/-.02/-.13**

-.10*/-.02/-.17***

-.17***/-.02/-.18***

-.18***/-.09+/-.18***

Internal locus of control

S2/3/5

.28***/.43***/.38***

.29***/.41***/.42***

.34***/.42***/.39***

.25***/.41***/.43***

.24***/.39***/.44***

.24***/.32***/.40***

External locus of control

S2/3/5

-.14*/-.21**/.01

-.12+/-.18*/.03

-.13*/-.14+/.10

-.02/-.10/.11+

-.07/-.07/.17**

-.06/-.00/.13*

Neuroticism

S2/3/5

-.27***/-.09/-.20***

-.27***/-.05/-.18**

-.26***/-.06/-.16**

-.22***/-.09/-.19**

-.26***/-.09/-.18**

-.25***/-.08/-.17**

Note. NS2 = 486, NS3 = 571, NS4 = 204, NS5 = 483. Following Gignac and Szodorai (2016): in black |r| < .20 (negligible to small), in green: |r| ≥ .20 (typical), in red: |r| ≥ .30 (strong).

a Response never (1) was coded as a missing value, to ensure that people who have no access to this ICT but would have used the ICT if possible not bias the analyses. + p < .10, * p < .05, ** p < .01, ***p < 00.