Schauffel, N., Schmidt, I., Peiffer, H., & Ellwart, T. (2021). ICT Self-Concept Scale (ICT-SC25). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). https://doi.org/10.6102/zis308_exz
![]() |
Nomological network of ICT-SC25g/e
Construct |
Sample(s) |
SCGL |
SCCO |
SCPS |
SCGE |
SCCSA |
SCSP |
|||
Affective |
||||||||||
Technophobia |
S3 |
-.60*** |
-.57*** |
-.52*** |
-.53*** |
-.49*** |
-.44*** |
|||
Technostrain |
S4 |
-.22** |
-.24** |
-.24** |
-.24** |
-.32*** |
-.25** |
|||
ICT interest |
S4 |
.63*** |
.56*** |
.58*** |
.66*** |
.57*** |
.70*** |
|||
Behavioral |
||||||||||
Frequency of use of a |
||||||||||
Emails |
S3 |
.39*** |
.33*** |
.32*** |
.30*** |
.33*** |
.28*** |
|||
Internet |
S3 |
.40*** |
.38*** |
.34*** |
.35*** |
.34*** |
.31*** |
|||
Payment services |
S3 |
.37*** |
.37*** |
.38*** |
.38*** |
.35*** |
.32*** |
|||
Spreadsheet programs |
S3 |
.37*** |
.37*** |
.33*** |
.39*** |
.34*** |
.30*** |
|||
Online conferences/chats |
S3 |
.19* |
.26** |
.24** |
.24** |
.12 |
.11 |
|||
Text processing programs |
S3 |
.32*** |
.40*** |
.37*** |
.45*** |
.44*** |
.38*** |
|||
Programming and coding |
S3 |
.00 |
.03 |
.06 |
.07 |
.08 |
.24** |
|||
Cognitive |
||||||||||
ICT trust |
S4 |
.41*** |
.37*** |
.36*** |
.41*** |
.46*** |
.45*** |
|||
Performance expectancy |
S4 |
.28** |
.27** |
.31** |
.29** |
.35*** |
.35*** |
|||
Effort expectancy |
S4 |
.45*** |
.51*** |
.48*** |
.46*** |
.51*** |
.44*** |
|||
Person |
||||||||||
Age |
S2/3/5 |
-.26***/-.13*/-.26*** |
-.22***/-.19***/-.25*** |
-.22***/-.17**/-.19*** |
-.27***/-.22***/-.21*** |
-.13**/-.16**/-.17*** |
-.19***/-.20***/-.27*** |
|||
Education |
S2/3/5 |
.14***/.22***/.08+ |
.17***/.27***/.08+ |
.16***/.23***/.10* |
.22***/.26***/.09* |
.10*/.19***/.05 |
.15***/.16**/.03 |
|||
Gender |
S2/3/5 |
-.08+/-.02/-.10* |
-.10*/.00/-.10* |
-.15***/-.02/-.13** |
-.10*/-.02/-.17*** |
-.17***/-.02/-.18*** |
-.18***/-.09+/-.18*** |
|||
Internal locus of control |
S2/3/5 |
.28***/.43***/.38*** |
.29***/.41***/.42*** |
.34***/.42***/.39*** |
.25***/.41***/.43*** |
.24***/.39***/.44*** |
.24***/.32***/.40*** |
|||
External locus of control |
S2/3/5 |
-.14*/-.21**/.01 |
-.12+/-.18*/.03 |
-.13*/-.14+/.10 |
-.02/-.10/.11+ |
-.07/-.07/.17** |
-.06/-.00/.13* |
|||
Neuroticism |
S2/3/5 |
-.27***/-.09/-.20*** |
-.27***/-.05/-.18** |
-.26***/-.06/-.16** |
-.22***/-.09/-.19** |
-.26***/-.09/-.18** |
-.25***/-.08/-.17** |
|||
Note. NS2 = 486, NS3 = 571, NS4 = 204, NS5 = 483. Following Gignac and Szodorai (2016): in black |r| < .20 (negligible to small), in green: |r| ≥ .20 (typical), in red: |r| ≥ .30 (strong).
a Response never (1) was coded as a missing value, to ensure that people who have no access to this ICT but would have used the ICT if possible not bias the analyses. + p < .10, * p < .05, ** p < .01, ***p < 00.