Zitieren

Wang, K. T., Wei, M., Zhao, R., Chuang, C. C., & Li, F. (2018). Cross-Cultural Loss Scale (CCLS).

Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS).

https://doi.org/10.6102/zis262

Download

@article{https://doi.org/10.6102/zis262,

doi = {10.6102/zis262},

url = {https://zis.gesis.org/DoiId/zis262,

author = {Wang, K. T., Wei, M., Zhao, R., Chuang, C. C., & Li, F.},

language = {en},

title = {Cross-Cultural Loss Scale (CCLS)},

journal = {Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS)},

publisher = {ZIS - GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences},

year = {2018}

}

Download

Wang, K. T., Wei, M., Zhao, R., Chuang, C. C., & Li, F. 'Cross-Cultural Loss Scale (CCLS).'

Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS), (2018).

https://doi.org/10.6102/zis262

Download

Wang, K. T., Wei, M., Zhao, R., Chuang, C. C., & Li, F. (2018). 'Cross-Cultural Loss Scale (CCLS).'

Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). ZIS - GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences.

doi: https://doi.org/10.6102/zis262

Download

Wang, K. T., Wei, M., Zhao, R., Chuang, C. C., & Li, F. 'Cross-Cultural Loss Scale (CCLS).'

Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). ZIS - GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2018,

doi: https://doi.org/10.6102/zis262

Download

TY - RPRT

T1 - Cross-Cultural Loss Scale (CCLS)

T2 - Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS)

AU - Wang, K. T.

AU - Wei, M.

AU - Zhao, R.

AU - Chuang, C. C.

AU - Li, F.

DO - https://zis.gesis.org/DoiId/zis262

UR - 10.6102/zis262

AB - The Cross-Cultural Loss Scale (CCLS), a measure of loss associated with crossing national boundaries, was developed across 2 samples of international students. With Sample 1 (<i>N = </i>262), exploratory factor analyses were used to select the 14 CCLS items and to determine 3 factors: Belonging-Competency, National Privileges, and Access to Home Familiarity. With Sample 2, confirmatory factor analyses (<i>N = </i>256) cross-validated the 3-factor oblique model as well as a bifactor model. CronbachÂ’s alpha and omega (Brunner, Nagy, &amp; Wilhelm, 2012) of both the CCLS total scale and the three CCLS subscales were acceptable to good and indicate that unweighted sum and mean scores can be computed. The validity of the CCLS scores was supported by its associations with related variables in the expected directions. Perceived cross-cultural losses were positively associated with negative affect, migration grief and loss, and discrimination and were negatively associated with life satisfaction, positive affect, general self-efficacy, and social connection with mainstream society. Moreover, the CCLS total and 2 subscale scores added significant incremental variance in predicting subjective well-being over and above related constructs. The results indicated measurement invariance and validity equivalency for the CCLS scores between men and women.

PY - 2018

PB - ZIS - GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences

LA - en

SN - https://zis.gesis.org/

Download

Wang, K. T., Wei, M., Zhao, R., Chuang, C. C., & Li, F. Cross-Cultural Loss Scale (CCLS).

Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). 2018;

Available from: https://doi.org/10.6102/zis262

Download